Hi,
In <435AE883.2070809@calixo.net>
"Re: Subversion 1.3.0 RC1" on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:33:55 +0200,
David Anderson <david.anderson@calixo.net> wrote:
> David James has been busy fixing some of this, so here is the current
> status of our SWIG bindings, tested on the two test architectures I
> had (x86_32 amd and x86_64 amd64):
>
> * Ruby builds on both. Three tests fail on both architectures (the
> same tests fail). I've mailed Kouhei to ask him to take a look at
> this and call whether this is a blocker or not.
I found the problem is caused from r16903.
Ruby bindings need to add
%import apr.h
or
%apply unsigned int { apr_uint32_t };
to apr.swg.
Is the latter case is better solution?
Thanks,
--
kou
Index: subversion/bindings/swig/include/apr.swg
===================================================================
--- subversion/bindings/swig/include/apr.swg (revision 16922)
+++ subversion/bindings/swig/include/apr.swg (working copy)
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
#undef OUTPUT_TYPEMAP
#endif
+
+%apply unsigned int { apr_uint32_t };
+
#endif
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------- */
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 23 04:15:11 2005