Re: svn commit: r16891 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr

"Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:

> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Philip Martin wrote:
>
>> Any reason not to use the errfile parameter? That's where the caller
>> expects to see error output.
>>
> What do you mean? In the revision at hand, errors between fork and exec
> are written to the childs stderr, which is the same as the errfile.

Ah yes, you are right. Hmm, what happens if errfile is null and
stderr has been closed, I think the fprintf is undefined behaviour?

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org