On 10/13/05, Max Bowsher <maxb@ukf.net> wrote:
> John Peacock wrote:
> > John Peacock wrote:
> >> What is supposed to be providing the crc32 function?
> >
> > This I can explain. It is Neon and apparently the version supplied by
> > SUSE
> > doesn't include it. :-(
> >
> >> Why is the _Core.so file
> >> linking against libsvn_ra_dav/.libs/libsvn_ra_dav-1.so.0 instead of the
> >> installed library (hint LD_RUN_PATH isn't set correctly)?
> >
> > Looking at the log entries, Max did on purpose, presumably to make sure
> > the
> > bindings were testing the new libraries rather than the old. I don't
> > think
> > that is correct for installed code, however, since I rather like the
> > ability to blow away my build directory after installation. ;-)
>
>
> Argh. I'm so used to libtool just DTRT on installation, it didn't even occur
> to me that the Perl bindings *don't use libtool*! Ugh.
>
> I guess that means that the change needs to be reverted, since the situation
> before is the lesser of two bugs.
>
> Max.
Should we revert r16486, then, and propose it for backport to the 1.3.x branch?
Cheers,
David
--
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
Received on Thu Oct 13 15:47:41 2005