Re: Suggestion: preventing inode crowding with FSFS

On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 12:47 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > The new layout cannot be on by default until 2.0.
>
> I'm not advocating that we implement a new layout, but if we do, why
> would it have to wait till 2.0 to be the default? I thought such a
> change could happen in a new minor release. From hacking.html:

Because one of the usage modes of FSFS is to put it in a shared
filesystem and access it from multiple clients, which might not be in
version-sync, it's adviseable to avoid backward-incompatible layout
changes when we can.

But you're right that it's not a hard requirement.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 7 21:05:51 2005