Re: [PATCH] Was: Enhancement needed in svn status -u

From: Daniel L. Rall <dlr_at_finemaltcoding.com>
Date: 2005-09-30 01:33:07 CEST

On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Mark Phippard wrote:
...
> I still think the URL and node kind fields ought to just always be
> populated. It seems like a waste of memory to duplicate them when they
> will never be different.

Couldn't the node kind field could actually differ, if an entry was deleted
and re-added as a different type (e.g. a file named "build" was deleted and
re-added as a directory).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 30 01:33:51 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel L. Rall: "Re: [PATCH] svn_repos_create should allow fs_config being null"
Previous message: Chia-liang Kao: "[PATCH] svn_repos_create should allow fs_config being null"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Phippard: "Re: [PATCH] Was: Enhancement needed in svn status -u"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]