Re: FSFS hotcopy issues

Greg Hudson wrote:
>
> If you take that statement to apply to locks and revision contents as
> a combined unit, then we irretrievably flubbed the locks table, by
> not binding it somehow to revision files.
>
> So I suggest you relax that constraint as a desirable, because we're
> never going to satisfy it in FSFS without doing something bad like
> grabbing the write lock before a hotcopy.

Well, you could do something like grabbing the write lock while copying
everything except the revs, and then copy the revs last.

- Marc

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Sep 25 14:51:00 2005