Re: FSFS hotcopy issues

On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 22:53 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> The design might be capable of that, but the client certainly disallows it.

Well, we went back and forth on that. I'm not sure if there's a real
concern with having such a thing.

> Regardless of that, it is defiinitely a bug to propagate a lock to a
> hotcopy, if the lock never existed on the revision which was selected as the
> head revision of the hotcopy.

In my mind, the lock table has no association with revisions; it's just
a table of locked pathnames, not bound to any particular revision. So I
don't see this as "definitely" a bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Sep 24 23:56:20 2005