Re: Right place for cleaning up entries fields on delete

On 9/23/05, Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
> Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> writes:
> > BTW: which part of the 'remove copyfrom-url and copyfrom-rev' do you
> > consider non-atomic? Modifying an entry is done with 1 call into
> > svn_wc__modify_entry.
>
> I don't know whether Ivan's change would have introduced an atomic
> problem, it's quite possible his change will be been OK. If he thinks
> svn_wc_delete2 is the best place to do then he may be right.
My opinion that in any case no atomic problems will be indroduced.
After discussion I can restate my question: Is this logic (about
cleanuping fields) should applied for all situation when scheduled
modifed from replaced to deleted or only when entry deleted by
svn_wc_delete2()?

--
Ivan Zhakov