On 21 Sep 2005 08:57:10 -0400, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> writes:
>
> > > Would you be +1 on getting rid of the enum type and just returning a
> > > constant string (i.e., allocated in static data segment, not pool)
> > > from svn_fs_type()? I'm happy to make the change...
> >
> > As you say, there are trade-offs, but I think your suggestion of strings
> > instead of an enum would be preferable, as it doesn't lend the (false)
> > appearance that all possible FS backend types are known.
>
> +1.
>
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 21 16:51:27 2005