Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> >>I think you need to "get with the boys" on this one. Branko clearly
> >>states, "...because even a technically perfect patch wouldn't be
> >>accepted if style wasn't correct" which is contrast to what you are
> >>saying above. I think one of the minor problems is there isn't an
> >>official stance on the matter and it's up to an individual committer as
> >>to how much effort they are willing to expend.
> >>
> >
> >No, "the boys", or rather, the boy, needs to get with me :-).
> >
> >Branko was simply wrong. And I'll bet he will admit that if he
> >happens read this followup. (*He* might not apply such a patch, but
> >many, many such patches have been applied. And, actually, he probably
> >would too, if it were good in other ways.)
> >
> Oh well, to quote my original response to Mark:
>
> > But I certainly see the techincal side as being more important than
> > the stylistic side; if I didn't, I'd have made the final tweaks
> > myself and committed the patch by now.
>
> So it seems that a lot of this conversation ie about something that
> hasn't happened, nor is it likely to happen.
Do you mean you never said "...because even a technically perfect
patch wouldn't be accepted if style wasn't correct", which you were
quoted as saying?
If not, my apologies for trusting the quoter instead of checking the
primary sources myself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 26 21:09:01 2005