David James wrote:
> On 7/26/05, Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>
>>(I've fixed the subject line, again. Grr. :-)
>
> Nice work, Julian. But since you're the only one using the new subject
> line,
(David: correction to my private message: John didn't use my subject line, but
then nor did he use the original one.)
> In an unrelated post, you changed the subject line of the thread
> "Possible open source project" to "A 'patch' program that understands
> 'svn diff' diffs"
No, I don't believe I did. I long ago learned not to start a new thread by
replying to an unrelated message, and I am sure I did not do so in this case.
Perhaps a bug in your mail client? As evidence, here are the full headers of
the message I sent:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000
Message-ID: <42E63D1A.90508@btopenworld.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:39:38 +0100
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com>
Reply-To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: A "patch" program that understands "svn diff" diffs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> without CC'ing the original author, who would likely
> be quite interested in your post, but is not on the list (Kyle Stemen
> <c8n1cpm02@sneakemail.com>). In future, it might be a good idea to use
> "Reply All", so you don't have to worry about that problem.
This paragraph is moot, but for your interest I always use "Reply All" to
respond to the list. I then selectively edit the address list as seems
appropriate, which nearly always includes leaving the original author's address in.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 26 19:40:58 2005