Re: svn commit: r15370 - in branches/python-bindings-improvements/subversion/bindings/swig: python/libsvn_swig_py python/svn

David James <james82@gmail.com> writes:

> On 7/20/05, Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
>> I didn't really understand the explanation.
> Would a more thorough explanation help?

To be honest I'm not really interested in the bindings, I just
happened to glance at the commit email :) You may, or may not, have
to convince other people.

> I
> think that this consistency is a Good Thing, because, with consistent
> variable names between bindings, we can (theoretically) write code
> which works with all three sets of bindings.

Although a program that tried to use more than one set (I guess that's
unlikely) might have problems with a multiple definitions of the same
name.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org