David Anderson <david.anderson@calixo.net> writes:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > David, try to break things down into little, separate patches, please.
>
> I'm planning to. When I said "It'll be corrected in my first patch", I
> wasn't thinking. It'll be corrected in my second patch. The first one
> will move the authz code to libsvn_repos, without validation-on-open.
>
> As for little, I'll do my best, but some of these will be fairly
> large, no matter how hard I try. For example, I don't think you'll
> like a patch that adds code to libsvn_repos without removing the code
> that does the same thing from mod_authz_svn.
>
> Nevertheless, I'll try to keep changes as small as possible for review.
Oh, unifiedness takes precedence of smallness any day, don't worry
about that. "No bigger than necessary" is really the guideline, not
so much "as small as possible".
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jul 2 04:28:19 2005