Re: Issue 2015, diff summarize solution?

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> Well, the short option name "-s" is perhaps not appropriate because
> this option is specific to one svn subcommand. "-q/--quiet" might be
> appropriate if it was going to behave like a cut-down version of "svn
> diff", but it seems that it is not going to do so. So probably just a
> long option "--summarize".

Actually, why not '-q'? I like the feature, I just don't see that we
need a new option to control it.

By the way, it's fine to combine -q and -v. "svn status" already does.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 3 21:31:35 2005