"Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jostein@josander.net> writes:
> I didn't feel criticized, just annoyed. This felt like hair in the soup
> or something. I have a quick temper, but usually cools down again. :-)
Well, Philip's questions are a bit more than just hair in the soup.
Trunk is preferable because more poeple watch trunk commits than watch
branch commits (especially when it's not a release branch). Also,
conceptually, trunk is the "master source" for all changes in the
project. By default, changes should enter on trunk and be ported out
to branches, unless there's a specific reason to do it differently.
So whenever someone starts doing work on a branch that seems like it
could be done on trunk instead, people will ask why. As Ben said,
it's nothing personal.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 14 03:17:32 2005