Re: Subversion 1.2.0 RC3 (final candidate) on Monday?

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>What would we say to rolling rc3 on Monday? Ben Reser, does that work
>for you? That would give us the weekend to vote on pending STATUS
>items (of which there are currently 10, but only 2 or 3 have any
>complexity to them).
>
>Assuming no showstoppers, rc3 would be the final candidate,
>essentially identical to 1.2.0, which would be released one week
>later. Of course, were we to find a bug in rc3 severe enough to
>warrant rc4, that would re-start the 1-week resoak.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>
I think we have to fix the propchange-commit bug that Stefan found
before rolling RC3. Otherwise, +1.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 7 00:18:16 2005