[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Release procedures improvements.

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2005-04-05 02:58:30 CEST

--On Monday, April 4, 2005 6:37 PM -0500 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> But can we can come up with a concrete reason why that would bother
> us? It seems odd to me too, at first, but I can't really say that it
> causes a problem -- and it certainly *solves* some problems...

If we say that if we release for signatures:

    subversion-1.5.9-PRERELEASE.tar.gz (using your example)

and that we yank it for whatever reason, that it means that we can not release:

    subversion-1.5.9.tar.gz

then I'd be fine with this, I guess.

What I'm opposed to (and unclear whether this is what is being suggested) is
that we have subversion-1.5.9-PRERELEASE.tar.gz that says it is "Subversion
1.5.9" and extracts as such and there is a *different* subversion-1.5.9.tar.gz
that we eventually released.

So, in short, once we release -PRERELEASE for signatures, it means that we
can't turn around and reuse that version number for a 'final' release.

Does that make sense? -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 5 02:59:48 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.