Re: Merge tracking

"Erik Huelsmann" <e.huelsmann@gmx.net> writes:

> > That explains why it was pushed back from 1.0 and now into "Medium-term
> > Goals", and doesn't really seem to have any chance of being done anytime
> > soon :)
>
> Actually, no. It was pushed back from 1.0, because delaying 1.0 for two
> more years (for locking, true renames and mergetracking) would have been
> insane. Both the client and server were fully functional at production
> quality level and self-hosting for over 4 years. It would have been plain
> stupid not to offer the 1.0 release: people were waiting for it.

Well, to be clear, it was pushed back from 1.0 because 1.0 was defined
as "basically, replace CVS". But yes, your statements about
functionality and readiness for public consumptions are accurate. :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 30 18:12:01 2005