Re: FSFS as default for svn 1.2?

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>:
> Although neither back end is perfect, I think FSFS is less likely to
> bite new users than BDB is.

While that's a good reason, the fact that the fs format is not an
opaque binary blob is a pretty good one too. I always regarded the
opaqueness of BDB as the single most worrying flaw in the Subversion
architecture. I am delighted to see fsfs reaching production.

> I guess the right way to decide this is a +/- vote, although people
> should give arguments if they have them. I'm +1, of course.

+1, but without any conviction that my vote ought to be significant
as I am not a developer.

-- 
		Eric S. Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org