Re: Subversion Branding / "whole product" (Was: Re: SmartSVN - a new Subversion client)

On Feb 24, 2005, at 12:20 PM, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> I suspect the difference is that most of the "*svn*" projects to date
> have been open source add-ons to Subversion. SmartSVN seems to be 1)
> commercial software and 2) a complete Subversion client.
>

I think the critical bit is that it shares zero code with "core"
Subversion. Every other piece of software in the Subversion ecosystem
is sharing the same core library code, all using the same APIs. This
is the first time a product is using the term 'SVN' to mean,
"interoperates with Subversion", rather than "built on Subversion's
codebase."

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 24 19:29:10 2005