Re: [PATCH] Use a short date format in "blame -v"

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:44:52PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> What say you about "svn list -v" then? Same arguments
> apply. I suppose I'd better submit an alternative patch
> which "fixes" the date in "svn list -v" to make it
> unambiguous but verbose, and see what the reaction to that
> is.

I wouldn't object, but I suspect a number would not like the
ping-ponging of format.

But if I recall correctly, the purpose of the change to the
current ls -v format was to mimic unixish ls -l behaviour.
There is no such analogy for blame output. And isn't the
current blame format already consistent with the canonical
input format?

Bruce

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 27 05:45:39 2005