Re: tsvn:logwidth in svn repository (Re: svn commit: r12696 - trunk/subversion/po)

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

[snip]
> It could be that you tend to tackle hard, complex problems where
> different people have very different approaches to the solutions.
> (The DLL thing might be an example of that, though I'm not
> knowledgeable enough about the problem to say for sure.) When you
> have posted reports and/or simple patches for obvious bugs, we have
> dealt with them promptly: r6664, r6175, r5936, r5190, and r4823 for
> example.
>
> So please don't just give up. Instead, try to guess whether a patch
> is likely to be simple and non-controversial, or likely to lead to
> long discussions. If you know the latter in advance, that might at
> least prepare you mentally for what's ahead.

I know that patches get rejected for several reasons. And I know it's
not just my patches. I just wanted to point out that (for me anyway,
since I don't know all the subversion code inside out) a patch which
would have implemented repository configs would have been rejected for
sure. That's why I didn't do it myself, and that's why I don't
understand such comments like "why didn't you write a patch for
subversion instead of the workaround in TSVN".

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org