Re: [PATCH] Ruby SWIG-based bindings

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> writes:

> Now that 1.3.24 is out, we should investigate whether we want to bump
> everyone up to that: but, as we understand it, it's not practical to
> support 1.3.19-1.3.21 and 1.3.24 at the same time. So, that really
> places me in the camp that we should hold off a bit on 1.3.24 to see
> if the SWIG folks change their mind yet again on how things should
> work... *sigh* -- justin

The last time this was discussed one of the swig developers said they
were now making more effort to preserve the ABI.

http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2004-12/0730.shtml

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org