Re: Relative Externals - format debate

Tor Ringstad wrote:
> [Max Bowsher]
>> I've looked over issue 1336. I think we can reasonably get relative
>> externals working for 1.2 [...]
>
> Do you by this also include "atomic intra-tree commits", as described
> by Stephen in an earlier posting:
>
> [Stephen Kennedy]
>> 3) sensible commit semantics for relative links (1167-"recursive
>> commit" 1448-"one connection per external"). Not mentioned is that
>> intra-tree commits should be merged so that they use a single
>> connection and are atomic.

No, I don't.

Although, that would be a very sensible enhancement to make to relative
externals, once we have them.

Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 10 18:16:52 2005