On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2004, at 11:08 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
> > Is this patch necessary? I mean, if you can access a repos via
> > "/path/to/repos", then you can proplist and propget unversioned
> > properties on the server side by using the 'svn' binary and
> > "file:///path/to/repos".
> >
>
> By that argument, almost all of the 'svnlook' subcommands are
> unnecessary, no?
> Pretty much everything 'svnlook' does is doable via 'svn' with file:///
> access.
>
> I thought the point of 'svnlook' was to create a vague sense of
> comfort, knowing that it can only read a filesystem, not change one.
>
Also, if you have everything in svnlook except this missing feature, why
not add it?
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 14 18:51:16 2004