Re: 'update' history tracing?

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 17:14, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > > ...tracing 'wctarget@BASE' back to 'newlocation@r10000', then doing an
> > > RA->do_switch() operation to the new URL and rev.
> >
> > There are complications to this, though.
>
> Also, I think update is pretty robustly interruptable and switch is
> not. Am I wrong about that?

Switch is getting much better in this area. (And if anyone knows of
any switch restartability issues, please point them out to me directly
-- this is an area of interest for me.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 12 06:03:48 2004