Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 04:21:46PM -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> > > Dissenting opinion is that the .svn/README.txt contents are useful:
> > >
> > > This is a Subversion working copy administrative directory.
> > > Visit http://subversion.tigris.org/ for more information.
> > >
> > > Well, that URL is the first thing returned by
> > >
> > > http://www.google.com/search?q=.svn
> >
> > Good point. Put me down as +0.5 on removing it, then :-).
>
> You mean -0.5 on removing it?
No, I meant +0.5.
Philip's mail was a little ambiguous, but I believe he was pointing
out that the .svn/README.txt file is not so necessary these days,
because a Google search for ".svn" turns up our home page anyway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 8 17:31:33 2004