On Oct 25, 2004, at 11:19 AM, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> On Oct 24, 2004, at 5:52 AM, Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz wrote:
>
>> Well, at least I would like to know what is the copyright status
>> of the images. Is it also under the creative commons license?
>>
>
> Well, the original images certainly are. Most of them are Powerpoint;
> you can find them if you look back in the history of doc/book/book
> far enough. O'Reilly then redrew the images, and "gave" them back to
> us for the website. The question is, who owns the newer, prettier
> images? O'Reilly? And what's the license on them? We probably need
> some clarification from O'Reilly.
>
> Regardless, we don't have the source for the "pretty" images, so it's
> probably a moot point. If you want to translate them, you'll probably
> have to use the original powerpoint source anyway.
The images are under the same copyright as the book. Our editor
confirmed this for us when O'Reilly re-did the images.
-Fitz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 27 18:29:54 2004