Re: path.c:113: svn_path_join: Assertion `is_canonical (base, blen)' failed.

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:03:09AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> Uhh yeah I object to revert r10731 at all. It is possible to pass
> 'foo//bar' directly into svn_path_dirname() and that will still provide
> a non-canonical result. Our canonical rules do not specify that this is
> a non-canonical path, therefor svn_path_dirname() would be violating its
> API contract without r10731. Therefore r10731 must be kept no matter
> what we decide to do about svn_path_dirname() with respect to URIs.

Ohh yeah good point. Nominating for 1.1.x right now then.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org