Re: 1.1.x backports (was Re: svn commit: r10604)
* Ben Collins-Sussman <email@example.com> [2004-08-12 14:49]:
> Remember ghudson's new plan in HACKING: assuming we find no critical
> bugs that require restarting the 'soak' period, we're going to release
> an RC3 about a week before the final 1.1.0, just as a sanity check. So
> feel free to nominate non-critical stuff that you feel should be in 1.1,
> and it will be merged for RC3.
There is a non-critical (and nearly trivial) bug fix attached to issue
#1949. It hasn't been applied to the trunk yet, so it can't properly
be nominated for porting to 1.1, but I think it would be nice if both
could happen. Would anyone be willing to review it?
Michael W. Thelen
The greatest of all weaknesses is the fear of appearing weak.
-- J.B. Bossuet, "Politics from Holy Writ", 1709
Received on Thu Aug 12 23:37:02 2004
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev