Re: 1.1.0-rc1 is marked as Stable in the source download area

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:24:45PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Tobias Ringström <tobias@ringstrom.mine.nu> writes:
> > OK, done, but why? It is not a stable release, so why label it as
> > such? I've seen one user download that file because it was supposed to
> > be stable.
>
> Yes, I am also mystified. Who said to mark it Stable, and why? I
> would think Draft is appropriate.

Well sussman said nobody would pay attention to it if it was marked as
Draft. And umm draft doesn't make sense. It's not a draft of
1.1.0-rc1. It is 1.1.0-rc1. If the flags were like stable, beta,
release canidate, etc... it might more sense but the flags totally don't
make sense for software.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org