Re: RFC: Process for 1.x.0 releases

On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 05:58, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I think your proposed change makes sense for the A.B.0 case (B != 0), but what
> about the A.0.0 case? (i.e. 2.0.0.)
>
> Could we make the case that a four-week 'no-touching rule' might make more
> sense before the first release of a new major version? I'd think it might -
> because if we really screw something up, we might be at (A+1).0.0. -- justin

Well, we can talk about more stringent release procedures for 2.0 when
it comes time to go in that direction, but I can't think of many
realistic scenarios where a four-week no-touching rule would really help
prevent that kind of mistake.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 22 22:40:30 2004