On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> "Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
>
> > So, if no one has any good reasons, I'd like to use the first approach
> > above, keeping compability between 1.1 and 1.2. Any objections?
>
> No objection here.
>
> We're making this change to enhance the user experience. I might be
> missing something, but I see no gain in switching our internal storage
> format (and the promises of all our interfaces), especially if we have
> to convert back just to use the one protocol that actually demands
> URLs (HTTP).
>
That was a good way of expressing it:-)
I am going for the way I proposed...
Thanks for the feedback cmpilato and sussman.
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 20 22:02:51 2004