Re: RFC: TLS support in svn protocol

On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 07:30, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >Whatever we do to mark up the URL for this purpose (or, if we don't mark
> >up the URL, to mark up the command), I think it needs to be short. So
> >the 's' suffix is appealing on those grounds.

> How about calling it "svn+tls"? Although this isn't strictly a tunneling
> scheme, it is consistent with the way tunneling schemes are defined. It
> would also be consistent with the svn tunnel client-side config file if
> we decide that we need it.

I don't like the idea. The proposed TLS support really has nothing to
do with tunneling in any way, shape, or form. It's just using a
particular security mechanism.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 14 00:51:43 2004