[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Unix-only code (was Re: svn commit: r10060 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs)

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-06-24 20:21:35 CEST

On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 13:55, John Peacock wrote:
> > No, but are there really that many people trying to build Subversion on
> > VMS? It's about correctness, not numbers.

> But that is exactly my point.

No, it's a convenient rhetorical trick. I agree that the WIN32 test is
incorrect, but you want to ditch it for another incorrect solution,
using "but how many people really care if it's incorrect?" as an
argument.

> The fact that the existing code makes that overly broad assumption
> doesn't make it right.

It makes it right in the context of this particular change. If we've
fallen into a particular pattern of bad-but-convenient behavior, it
makes perfect sense to take advantage of that as long as it won't make
it any harder to dig ourselves out of the hole at such a time as it
becomes necessary.

> It's about correctness, not numbers. ;)

*I* never used numbers as an argument (except to demonstrate the fallacy
of your argument).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 24 20:22:49 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.