Re: svn_cmdline_printf and errors

> On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 17:31, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> > Why do we ignore SIGPIPE?
>
> A Unix program which uses the network must ignore SIGPIPE or it will be
> unreliable in the face of lost connections.
>
> Even disregarding that, if you run "svn log file://blah | less" and quit
> out of less, we need to close the database or we could leave it wedged.
>
> We should not be ignoring printf errors, but SIGPIPE is not the answer.

Which implies that it is ok to return svn_error_t *'s?

BTW: You all know there is an issue on the subject?

http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=780

bye,

Erik.

-- 
"Sie haben neue Mails!" - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen!
Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org