[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: replacing SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT for translation

From: Peter N. Lundblad <lundblad_at_softhome.net>
Date: 2004-05-10 17:32:33 CEST

On Mon, 10 May 2004, Greg Hudson wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 04:03, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 16:05, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> > > > 2) Replace the SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT'- with their real value; thus hardcoding the
> > > > format into about 200 strings.
> > >
> > > I'm not terribly opposed to this, since we control the definition of
> >
> > What are the chances that long will not do for a revision number for the
> > forseable future? Isn't long at least 32 bits, at least on all platforms
> > we
> > support? Are you expecting to change it to at least 64 bits?
>
> Perhaps you missed a "not"?
>
No, I didn't. But answering to the quote above was confusing, I see now. I
just wanted to know any reason why people (maybe not you:-) want to keep the
SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT indirection layer.

Regards,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 10 17:23:11 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.