Philip Martin wrote:
> > I'm seeing stress.pl failures when using the new FSFS backend. I'm
> > running two instances
> >
> > $ .../stress.pl -c -s0
> > $ .../stress.pl -s0
>
> Oops! I'm using r9587 and passing -f to get FSFS so that should be
>
> $ .../stress.pl -c -s0 -f
> $ .../stress.pl -s0
I believe I know the cause of this, I forgot the actually check to see
if the transaction was out of date after acquiring the write lock. It
fixes the stress test, and I'll commit once it makes it through all
the normal tests.
-Josh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 1 02:38:10 2004