Re: FSFS: Plan of attack

Greg,

First, I'd like to say thanks for working your way through my document.

Greg Hudson wrote:

>On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 00:16, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>
>>Having read Glenn's document in full in the past, I don't recall
>>feeling that it's size was not warranted by the scope of the problem.
>>
>>
>
>Well, the size wasn't my only criticism; I felt like it wandered a lot.
>
Heh, you know I've never heard this about my writing before:-) I've
been told my writing is easier to follow after meeting me. I'm a bit
hyper and as such I shift gears quickly.

>I often had trouble telling when it was talking about the API-level
>vtable or about the FSP-level vtable within the baseline FSAP, and there
>were a lot of personal comments which tended to draw my attention
>astray.
>
I can see both of these points. I'll take another stab clarifying some
sections. I wasn't happy with my discussion of the construction of the
three primary objects either. It's crucial to understanding the
flexibility I'm trying to build in.

As for your remaining comments: I've started a response but I need to
sleep on it.

I'll post back tomorrow with more.

Thanks again,
gat
Received on Tue Apr 13 07:01:05 2004