Re: FS abstraction levels

On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 21:19, Branko Èibej wrote:
> >I don't think I can reuse much of an implementation that maps FS
> >concepts to DB concepts. Though there may be some stuff that can be
> >factored out, particularly in the realm of auto-merging.

> And probably the DAG abstraction, too. Maybe the API vtable should be at
> the DAG layer, not the public FS layer.

Does this count as a drive-by proposal?

For one thing, I can't tell what you mean. Sentence one suggests I
could reuse the code in dag.c (which I doubt), and sentence two suggests
we should put the abstraction barrier at a level which allows multiple
different implementations of dag.c (which I also doubt; tree.c appears
to rely on the concept of transactions).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 1 05:53:50 2004