Re: copy/remove weirdness

On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 11:20, Joe Drew wrote:

> Ok. So long as this is a known issue, I'm happy.
>

Definitely a known issue. :-)

> Here is how I would word such a note:
>
> NOTE: BASE, COMMITTED and PREV all refer to the working copy, and as such do
> not operate on repository URLs.

Ahhhh. Yes. Makes sense, thanks. Fitz: maybe we can add this to your
book TODO list?

>
> > Again, though: I will grant you that these two keywords *could* be
> > hitting the repository URLs as a means of converting the keywords into
> > real numbers. Perhaps we should file this as an enhancement request.
>
> I'd very much like a "try repository URLs when local resolution fails" RFE.
> I don't know what your long-term plans are for moving from .svn/entries, but
> that'd be a nice stopgap measure.

Want to file an enhancement request? Go for it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 31 19:33:16 2004