Re: problem in 1.0.1 tarball

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Philip Martin wrote:

> Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
>
> > Looks like SVN_VER_NUMTAG was not changed to "". Thus, any 1.0.1
> > installation running via Apache will say it is running 1.0.1-dev.
>
> There is also a testsuite patch on the 1.0.0 branch that didn't make
> it onto the 1.0.x branch, see this thread:
>
> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2004-03/0769.shtml
>
>

I think this was what I was seeing on my Fedora and WBEL3 builds (but not
RedHat 7.3, 8.0, or 9.0 for some reason).

When I included that patch in the build the problem went away. I'm not
convinced that it isn't something wierd I'm doing in my Fedora and WBEL3
SPEC files yet, though.

-- 
David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org