Re: svn up: ask if keep deleted, or restore?

Julian Foad wrote:
> I don't see this as a very strong issue, nor one that needs to be
> configurable, but it is worth considering. At the moment I can't
> think of a convincing use case for the present behaviour. Providing
> an easy way to revert a file is no argument, because we have a
> command for doing that, but maybe that was the original reason for
> it, before "svn revert" existed. Can anyone shed more light on it?

I have no knowledge, but I have a feeling it is just for a niche for
old CVS people who expect it to do that.

I feel it would be more consistent to not restore the file, unless
explicitly asked with "svn revert".

-- Naked

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 17 15:56:38 2004