[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Makefile target naming conventions

From: Daniel L. Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-03-17 02:32:43 CET

Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:16:22PM -0800, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> +swig-java-clean:
>>> + rm -rf $(SWIG_JAVA_DIR)/org/tigris/subversion/swig/
>>> +
>>> # Different versions of SWIG generate the Java source files in
>>> # different directories.
>>> swig-java-setup:
>>
>>
>>
>> You mean clean-swig-java. :)
>
>
> Well, I was following the pattern established by Justin with the
> "javahl-java", "javahl-tests", and "javahl-javah" targets, and
> perpetuated by myself in r9080 with the "swig-java-java",
> "swig-java-api", "swig-java-tests" targets.
>
> Justin did use a "clean-javahl" target, and I followed suite with
> "clean-swig-java" target (also in r9080). I noticed the difference, but
> figured it wouldn't be long before someone would clue me in on what
> convention we are actually using.
>
> [action]-[thing-being-built]-[anything-more-here?] ???

I'm unclear that we're even using convention past lowercase naming involving
separating words by dashes (sometimes). What about targets like "doc-clean"
and "fast-distclean"?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 17 02:33:06 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.