Re: Regression Test Failure on 1.0.1

David Summers <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:

> Apparently it does depend on which python is installed. The one that
> failed is on WBEL3 and is python-2.2.3-5. I just compiled with RedHat 9
> which is python-2.2.2-26 and it passed all the tests no problem.

In your original mail you showed

> Actual standard output:
> =====
> svn, version 1.0.1

which does not have a trailing (rXXXX) or (dev build) and would
explain why the regex failed to match. The patch I identified made
the trailing part optional.

Two questions:
 - How did you produce that 1.0.1 output?
 - The diff below shows an inconsistency in the tagged svn_version.h
   files, which of them is correct?

$ svn diff https://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/1.0.0/subversion/include/svn_version.h https://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/1.0.1/subversion/include/svn_version.h
Index: svn_version.h
===================================================================
--- svn_version.h (.../0/subversion/include/svn_version.h) (revision 9029)
+++ svn_version.h (.../1/subversion/include/svn_version.h) (revision 9029)
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
  *
  * Modify for every released patch.
  */
-#define SVN_VER_MICRO 0
+#define SVN_VER_MICRO 1
 
 /** Library version number.
  *
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
  *
  * Always change this at the same time as SVN_VER_NUMTAG.
  */
-#define SVN_VER_TAG ""
+#define SVN_VER_TAG " (dev build)"
 
 
 /** Number tag: a string describing the version.
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
  *
  * Always change this at the same time as SVN_VER_TAG.
  */
-#define SVN_VER_NUMTAG ""
+#define SVN_VER_NUMTAG "-dev"
 
 
 /** Revision number: The repository revision number of this release.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org