Re: API/Interface design questions

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I think we are generally encouraging folks to keep the codebase
> completely free of changes that would force us into 2.0 land, at least
> until the 1.0.x branch is on life support and the 1.x changes are on a
> branch.

Sorry, I was not clear. I was proposing only to prepare the ground for 2.0.
The changes would be API compatible (and so suitable for 1.1.0); I was just
suggesting that the original function (with new pool term) be positioned to go
semi-public in the 2.0 timeframe.

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org