Re: The new svn_wc_adm_*_depth functions.

Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> If this patch had appeared pre-1.0 I'd have replaced the non-depth
> interface with the depth one, i.e. I'd have made svn_wc_adm_open take
> a depth argument. If we ever produce the fabled "new libsvn_wc" then
> it will probably use a completely different interface without any of
> the current names--well, that's true for the one I'd write. I don't
> know whether that's a 2.0 thing.

This seems to be saying you agree with my proposal to deprecate, then.

(And if we rewrite libsvn_wc for 2.0, that's just more deprecation.
Uh, *much* more deprecation :-) ).

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 8 19:29:02 2004