Re: "not under version control" error - continued

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> Ah, sure, that was my first instinct. It fixes the problem and passes
> all regression tests. But the access-baton isn't being examined at all
> anymore...does this change somehow undo some other logic that was going
> on here?

I think it's stuff I wrote, but I can't remember why I chose to use
access_baton rather than b->added, using added looks sensible.

Incidentally, your new regression test doesn't need to call
run_and_verify_merge twice, just set the dry_run argument (the one
after the check_props argument) and the one call to
run_and_verify_merge will do both merges.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org