[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8407 - in branches/1.0-stabilization: . packages/rpm/redhat-7.x packages/rpm/redhat-8+

From: Jostein Chr. Andersen <jostein_at_josander.net>
Date: 2004-01-21 17:00:05 CET

On Wednesday 21 January 2004 03.39, cmpilato@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Tue Jan 20 20:39:38 2004
> New Revision: 8407
>
> Modified:
> branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS
> branches/1.0-stabilization/packages/rpm/redhat-7.x/find-osrel
> branches/1.0-stabilization/packages/rpm/redhat-8+/find-osrel
> Log:
> Merge r8296 and remove it from STATUS:

I've been asking about this on IRC one week ago. My question was somthing
like:
-Should changes in the installers be merged into the 1.0-stabilization
branch or what do we do about it? No one could really answer so I hope
someone can do it here.

Does this commit mean that all installer changes should be merged into
the 1.0-stabilization? Sometimes, this is things that have to be done
_after_ a tarball release.

I'm almost finished with my Apache handling (Subversion server/apache
module) and expect to commit this changes tomorrow afternoon.

So what do I do? Should I (and other distro makers) just continue to
commit it to the trunk and deliver the installer from there?

Jostein

-- 
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 21 17:02:10 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.