Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)

"Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jostein@josander.net> writes:
> I'm not allowed to vote for stuff in the STATUS file, but I would say
> that r8229 and r8230 should come straight into the 1.0-stabilization
> branch and the "spurious username prompt" looks like a thing we should
> not have in a 1.0 version. Can someone do a quick decision here?
>
> I don't want to make a 0.xx.1 version 8 hours after a x.xx.0 again (it
> makes me look like a fool) :-)

I'm reviewing changes and doing some voting right now.

But remember there is a 0.37 planned for only a week later anyway, so
there's no need for a 0.36.1 unless it's a really _awful_ bug :-).

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jan 11 22:14:34 2004